- Thread Author
- #1
If you had to choose ONLY ONE during your lean hypertrophy phase (or even during a cutting phase focused on preserving muscle mass):
Both systems, when well-structured and executed, can deliver outstanding results — but the choice makes a real difference over the long term depending on context, genetics, recovery, and goals.
ADVANTAGES OF PUSH-PULL-LEGS F2:
Greater total volume distributed across muscle groups
Clear separation of movement patterns
More specific focus on pulling and pushing work
Ideal for intermediate to advanced bodybuilders with solid recovery capacity
Drawbacks? It can become very demanding if volume isn't properly periodized. Also, muscle groups like shoulders or arms may suffer due to "invisible overlap" from training sessions.
ADVANTAGES OF UPPER-LOWER-UPPER (TPT) F2:
High frequency with double upper body stimulus per week (the area that defines aesthetics)
Better lower body recovery by spacing out demanding sessions
Very useful for those aiming to balance strength and hypertrophy
Drawbacks? Less separation between movement patterns, making it harder to isolate specific muscle groups. And if not well structured, back or chest volume may fall short.
MY POINT OF VIEW (and experience):
As a natural lifter, I greatly value training frequency, volume control, and the ability to avoid invisible overtraining.
If you prioritize an aesthetic physique and know your own limits well, a well-designed UPPER-LOWER-UPPER split can provide consistency and results without burning you out.
But if you’re passionate about total weekly volume and can handle heavy loads, a solid PPL can give you that extra density and muscle separation.
What about you?
Which structure has given you the best results?
Which one would you recommend to someone in a continuous improvement phase?
Both systems, when well-structured and executed, can deliver outstanding results — but the choice makes a real difference over the long term depending on context, genetics, recovery, and goals.
ADVANTAGES OF PUSH-PULL-LEGS F2:
Greater total volume distributed across muscle groups
Clear separation of movement patterns
More specific focus on pulling and pushing work
Ideal for intermediate to advanced bodybuilders with solid recovery capacity
Drawbacks? It can become very demanding if volume isn't properly periodized. Also, muscle groups like shoulders or arms may suffer due to "invisible overlap" from training sessions.
ADVANTAGES OF UPPER-LOWER-UPPER (TPT) F2:
High frequency with double upper body stimulus per week (the area that defines aesthetics)
Better lower body recovery by spacing out demanding sessions
Very useful for those aiming to balance strength and hypertrophy
Drawbacks? Less separation between movement patterns, making it harder to isolate specific muscle groups. And if not well structured, back or chest volume may fall short.
MY POINT OF VIEW (and experience):
As a natural lifter, I greatly value training frequency, volume control, and the ability to avoid invisible overtraining.
If you prioritize an aesthetic physique and know your own limits well, a well-designed UPPER-LOWER-UPPER split can provide consistency and results without burning you out.
But if you’re passionate about total weekly volume and can handle heavy loads, a solid PPL can give you that extra density and muscle separation.
What about you?
Which structure has given you the best results?
Which one would you recommend to someone in a continuous improvement phase?