Support

Back Support
Sounds promising😊
Also can you please do a fresh lab test on your igf1? The current and only one is quite old..
For compounds like IGF-1, testing is often carried out by our customers. As you know, we support blind testing initiatives. For our internal purposes and product release, we rely on quality control testing conducted by the laboratory.
 
For compounds like IGF-1, testing is often carried out by our customers. As you know, we support blind testing initiatives. For our internal purposes and product release, we rely on quality control testing conducted by the laboratory.
Have you conducted any recent tests on the raw material?

Secondly, I don’t have an issue with sending a blind test myself, but specifically when it comes to IGF-1, I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect the customer to do so, given that each vial has a high cost. It would mean sacrificing an entire vial for a test, which is already quite expensive. With AAS oils, the process is much simpler, but in this case, it’s different. Therefore, when it comes to IGF-1, it would be far more appropriate if you, as the seller, ensured that it is properly tested.
 
Have you conducted any recent tests on the raw material?

Secondly, I don’t have an issue with sending a blind test myself, but specifically when it comes to IGF-1, I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect the customer to do so, given that each vial has a high cost. It would mean sacrificing an entire vial for a test, which is already quite expensive. With AAS oils, the process is much simpler, but in this case, it’s different. Therefore, when it comes to IGF-1, it would be far more appropriate if you, as the seller, ensured that it is properly tested.
The company conducts testing on all raw materials before production.

As a seller, it’s important for us to ensure that the products we offer meet the stated standards — and we take that responsibility seriously. I understand your point about sacrificing a vial for testing, especially with something like IGF-1 where the cost is higher. That’s why we offer compensation in the form of store credit — so you’re not at a loss and still get both the test results and reimbursement.

We’ll also review any tests that haven’t been updated in a while and I’ll make sure to pass your feedback on to management — thanks for bringing this up, it’s appreciated.
 
The company conducts testing on all raw materials before production.

As a seller, it’s important for us to ensure that the products we offer meet the stated standards — and we take that responsibility seriously. I understand your point about sacrificing a vial for testing, especially with something like IGF-1 where the cost is higher. That’s why we offer compensation in the form of store credit — so you’re not at a loss and still get both the test results and reimbursement.

We’ll also review any tests that haven’t been updated in a while and I’ll make sure to pass your feedback on to management — thanks for bringing this up, it’s appreciated.
It appears that Jano has updated the website, both layout and services.

First, if a customer chooses to test something like IGF-1, how can a truly blind test be conducted when the selection already specifies whether IGF-1 is being tested at the time of ordering?

Second, as shown, the base price is $300 plus any additional tests. How many—and which—of these supplementary tests do you cover beyond the initial $300?

Finally, this brings me back to my original concern. This is a very expensive test, combined with a significant cost on the vial. Given that, it seems reasonable in this case that you, as the seller, might be responsible for carrying out or covering this specific testing?

 
It appears that Jano has updated the website, both layout and services.

First, if a customer chooses to test something like IGF-1, how can a truly blind test be conducted when the selection already specifies whether IGF-1 is being tested at the time of ordering?

Second, as shown, the base price is $300 plus any additional tests. How many—and which—of these supplementary tests do you cover beyond the initial $300?

Finally, this brings me back to my original concern. This is a very expensive test, combined with a significant cost on the vial. Given that, it seems reasonable in this case that you, as the seller, might be responsible for carrying out or covering this specific testing?

Yes — in most cases you need to specify IGF-1 for it to be properly detected. Labs don’t “guess” what’s inside a sample; they use specific methods and reference standards for each compound. For something like IGF-1, which is a peptide, targeted analysis is required. A “blind test” usually means the lab doesn’t know the source of the sample — not that they don’t know what they’re testing for.

That said, I understand your concern — this type of analysis is indeed expensive. As I mentioned, I’ll raise this point with management and see what can be done on our side.
 
Yes — in most cases you need to specify IGF-1 for it to be properly detected. Labs don’t “guess” what’s inside a sample; they use specific methods and reference standards for each compound. For something like IGF-1, which is a peptide, targeted analysis is required. A “blind test” usually means the lab doesn’t know the source of the sample — not that they don’t know what they’re testing for.

That said, I understand your concern — this type of analysis is indeed expensive. As I mentioned, I’ll raise this point with management and see what can be done on our side.
It would be awesome if you choose to do a fresh test - and if you add relevant supplementary tests you would be way ahead of competitors which im sure would bring up your sales on igf1
Looking forward
 
Last edited:
Back
Top