Your Wishes
- Thread starter Driadashop
- Start date
These bundles are great, but I would love the option to remove the HCG and Anastrozole from them.
@Driadashop
@Driadashop
ligmalight
Newbie
Agree
Thanks Driada for everything im extremely happy with the service but I wanted to ask if there will be any more nootropics added? I will definitely try the modafinil but I would love to see other ones as well. Things like tak653, adhd medicine like ritalin, racetams, etc. I think a lot of people would love to see this and I would be happy to try it out
Hello Driada! Please consider adding the following products to your store:
- Eplernone.
- HCTZ (hydrochlorothiazide).
- Empagliflozin.
- Tretinoin cream
- Pregabalin
Many individuals are resorting to sourcing these products directly from India at the moment, and I'm sure stocking them would bring more customers and increase your revenue! Thank you for your time.
- Eplernone.
- HCTZ (hydrochlorothiazide).
- Empagliflozin.
- Tretinoin cream
- Pregabalin
Many individuals are resorting to sourcing these products directly from India at the moment, and I'm sure stocking them would bring more customers and increase your revenue! Thank you for your time.
Last edited:
agreed, also minoxidil 2.5mg, different tretinoin creme dosages and pregabalin
kospetm3tank
Newbie
Mexidol
Dukuz.Israpilov
Beginner
Even 150 mg./ml for dihydroboldenon not possible? So big difference with boldenone on other steroids? Maybe different esther?
It is a very niche compound. Why would you need it in particular?
because it would crystallize very easily since it's a very unstable compound at high doses
Very interesting compound, we will be considering adding it thanks
I'd be interested in collaborating on a wider selection of bundles, organized by specific goals, experience levels, and product categories.
For example, separate AAS-only and peptide-only bundles, alongside more specialized options for different training objectives and body compositions.
I'm genuinely passionate about researching pharmacology, comparing compounds, and reviewing cycle structures. I'd be happy to contribute ideas and help evaluate the available combinations.
I think giving customers more flexibility would make these bundles even more appealing.
Would the community be interested in something like this?
hello i use it (from another brand right now) and is gave me the sensation of a mix of drostalone and primobolan.
Well why don't you just use drostanolone or primobolan directly instead, stanolone itself has very weak anabolic properties
That's a great question, and I'll try to explain my reasoning as clearly and simply as possible.
First of all, the main reason I use Stenbolone instead of combining Primobolan and Masteron (Drostanolone) is that I want to achieve a balance of their effects while using just one compound instead of two.
Let me explain why.
Although Stenbolone is not generally considered an extremely powerful anabolic compound, I find its overall profile particularly interesting, especially from an aesthetic perspective.
In my view, Stenbolone sits somewhere between Primobolan and Masteron, combining certain characteristics of both while offering some potential advantages.
Here's how I would compare them:
1. Muscle Growth (Anabolic Potential)
I consider Stenbolone slightly more effective than Primobolan for muscle growth and noticeably more anabolic than Masteron.
2. Fat-Burning Potential
In my assessment, Stenbolone falls between the other two compounds: potentially less effective than Masteron, but more effective than Primobolan.
3. Lean Muscle Quality
When it comes to building dense, high-quality lean muscle, I would place Stenbolone above Masteron but below Primobolan.
4. Muscle Definition and Aesthetic Effects
This is one of the main reasons I find Stenbolone interesting.
Masteron's cosmetic effects tend to become much more noticeable when body fat is already relatively low. Stenbolone, on the other hand, seems to offer some similar aesthetic benefits even at moderately higher body-fat levels.
In terms of overall muscle definition, I would therefore place Stenbolone somewhere between Primobolan and Masteron, with the potential advantage of not requiring such a low body-fat percentage for its effects to become noticeable.
5. Side Effects and Tolerability
I generally consider Stenbolone to have a relatively mild side-effect profile, broadly comparable to Primobolan and Masteron.
I also believe it may have a lower tendency to cause androgenic cosmetic side effects, particularly acne and hair loss, compared with Masteron.
Of course, these comparisons reflect my interpretation of the compounds rather than conclusions established by direct clinical studies.
So, why do I combine Stenbolone with Testosterone alone?
Quite simply, because I want to avoid unnecessary overlap between compounds that provide similar benefits.
By combining Testosterone with Stenbolone, my goal is to obtain a reasonable balance of muscle growth, lean muscle quality, and aesthetic effects without necessarily having to use both Primobolan and Masteron.
However, my preferences change depending on my physique and my specific goals.
When my body-fat percentage is lower and I want to emphasize muscle hardness, definition, and overall aesthetics, I prefer the combination of Testosterone + Primobolan + Masteron.
On the other hand, when my main objective is to maximize lean muscle growth and overall muscular development, my favorite combination is Testosterone + Primobolan + DHB (Dihydroboldenone).
Ultimately, that's the logic behind my choices.
I don't necessarily consider Stenbolone superior to Primobolan or Masteron in every respect. Rather, I see it as a potential middle ground between the two, which is precisely why I sometimes prefer combining it with Testosterone alone instead of using three different compounds.
In short, my choice depends on whether I'm prioritizing simplicity, muscle growth, or overall aesthetics.
First of all, the main reason I use Stenbolone instead of combining Primobolan and Masteron (Drostanolone) is that I want to achieve a balance of their effects while using just one compound instead of two.
Let me explain why.
Although Stenbolone is not generally considered an extremely powerful anabolic compound, I find its overall profile particularly interesting, especially from an aesthetic perspective.
In my view, Stenbolone sits somewhere between Primobolan and Masteron, combining certain characteristics of both while offering some potential advantages.
Here's how I would compare them:
1. Muscle Growth (Anabolic Potential)
I consider Stenbolone slightly more effective than Primobolan for muscle growth and noticeably more anabolic than Masteron.
2. Fat-Burning Potential
In my assessment, Stenbolone falls between the other two compounds: potentially less effective than Masteron, but more effective than Primobolan.
3. Lean Muscle Quality
When it comes to building dense, high-quality lean muscle, I would place Stenbolone above Masteron but below Primobolan.
4. Muscle Definition and Aesthetic Effects
This is one of the main reasons I find Stenbolone interesting.
Masteron's cosmetic effects tend to become much more noticeable when body fat is already relatively low. Stenbolone, on the other hand, seems to offer some similar aesthetic benefits even at moderately higher body-fat levels.
In terms of overall muscle definition, I would therefore place Stenbolone somewhere between Primobolan and Masteron, with the potential advantage of not requiring such a low body-fat percentage for its effects to become noticeable.
5. Side Effects and Tolerability
I generally consider Stenbolone to have a relatively mild side-effect profile, broadly comparable to Primobolan and Masteron.
I also believe it may have a lower tendency to cause androgenic cosmetic side effects, particularly acne and hair loss, compared with Masteron.
Of course, these comparisons reflect my interpretation of the compounds rather than conclusions established by direct clinical studies.
So, why do I combine Stenbolone with Testosterone alone?
Quite simply, because I want to avoid unnecessary overlap between compounds that provide similar benefits.
By combining Testosterone with Stenbolone, my goal is to obtain a reasonable balance of muscle growth, lean muscle quality, and aesthetic effects without necessarily having to use both Primobolan and Masteron.
However, my preferences change depending on my physique and my specific goals.
When my body-fat percentage is lower and I want to emphasize muscle hardness, definition, and overall aesthetics, I prefer the combination of Testosterone + Primobolan + Masteron.
On the other hand, when my main objective is to maximize lean muscle growth and overall muscular development, my favorite combination is Testosterone + Primobolan + DHB (Dihydroboldenone).
Ultimately, that's the logic behind my choices.
I don't necessarily consider Stenbolone superior to Primobolan or Masteron in every respect. Rather, I see it as a potential middle ground between the two, which is precisely why I sometimes prefer combining it with Testosterone alone instead of using three different compounds.
In short, my choice depends on whether I'm prioritizing simplicity, muscle growth, or overall aesthetics.