Your Wishes

How to Earn Rewards

GHK-Cu
GLOW
tb500 and bpc-157 blends
50mg sildenafil/30mg Dapoxetine blend (1/2 strength super kamagra)
Since you mentioned Glow blend, I heard really good things about Klow blend (Jordan Peters, the british bodybuilder really recommends it for injuries). As far as I know it's a mix of BPC157, GHK-Cu, KPV, TB4 and/or TB500 (I've seen formulations with either one, probably would be best to include both since Klow is the nuclear option to redline healing).
 
Hello

I have no complaints about Driada's Anavar.

However, 25 mg or 50 mg tablets would be a good idea.

It is a molecule that generally requires dosing

. The 10 mg sachets are quickly consumed. Kind regards


___________________________________________

French modo edit : Speak in English. Stick to the rules.
Thank you. This is not the first time we hear about 25 and 50 mg. I will keep it mind.
 
GHK-Cu
GLOW
tb500 and bpc-157 blends
50mg sildenafil/30mg Dapoxetine blend (1/2 strength super kamagra)
Mixing TB-500 and BPC-157 isn’t that easy. I have a friend who runs his own lab where they make peptides. He told me they did manage to mix the two, but it took them some time. Normally, peptides can break down when mixed. I’m not sure if the lab we get our peptides from can do it the same way.
 
Mixing TB-500 and BPC-157 isn’t that easy. I have a friend who runs his own lab where they make peptides. He told me they did manage to mix the two, but it took them some time. Normally, peptides can break down when mixed. I’m not sure if the lab we get our peptides from can do it the same way.

for me that´s no big deal if they are not mixed and sold seperately ...
so can choose your individual dosing ... go higher with one, etc ...
 
Mixing TB-500 and BPC-157 isn’t that easy. I have a friend who runs his own lab where they make peptides. He told me they did manage to mix the two, but it took them some time. Normally, peptides can break down when mixed. I’m not sure if the lab we get our peptides from can do it the same way.
That's interesting, from what I've heard, the problem is the solvents/preservatives. I have combined up to 5 peptides from driada in the same syringe with zero issues, but apparently, whatever is added to the peptides can cause other peptides to degrade.
 
Mixing TB-500 and BPC-157 isn’t that easy. I have a friend who runs his own lab where they make peptides. He told me they did manage to mix the two, but it took them some time. Normally, peptides can break down when mixed. I’m not sure if the lab we get our peptides from can do it the same way.
I just assumed that the labs that do it just add 5mg of each to the vial, but I can understand the possibility of breaking down over time once reconstituted.

It'd at least be cool to adjust the "injury support- popular stack" to get the 20% discount. You have to get 6 x 2mg TB500 and either 6 x 2mg BPC157 or 2 x 10mg BPC157. I think most people would end up getting the 2 x10mg BPC because it's cheaper, but then have 8mg left, enough for almost 4 more weeks, but not enough TB500.

cutting it to a ~5 week cycle is a little cleaner with 5 x 2mg TB500 and 1 x 10mg BPC157. This would be ~203 without discount or ~162.4 with discount. If you just discounted the 5 x 2mg TB500 but not the 1 x 10 BPC, it would be ~174.


If you did a cost per week breakdown of the current options-

6 x 2 of each = 264/6 weeks= ~44 per week
6 x 2 and 2 x 10= 232/6 weeks = ~38.67 a week with 8mg leftover BPC
if you bought 4 extra TB500 vials at normal cost to go with the 8mg leftover, you could push it another 4 weeks totaling 348 at a cost of ~34.80 a week for 10 weeks, with the caveat that you started the clock on the second 10mg bottle so you'd need to run the full 10 weeks straight.

with my 5 week cycle proposal
5 x 2mg TB500 and 1 x 10mg BPC157, no discount = 203 / 5 weeks = ~40.30 per week
5 x 2mg TB500 and 1 x 10mg BPC157, TB discount= 174 / 5 weeks = ~34.80 per week
5 x 2mg TB500 and 1 x 10mg BPC157, full discount= 163/ 5 weeks= ~32.60 per week

-- If there was a 10mg TB500 option, assuming the TB500 can stay stable long enough ( which is implied in the option for 2 x 10mg for 6 weeks) at the same discount rate between the 2mg and 10mg BPC157 prices, the cost would be between 64 and 65 euro.

This would mean a 5 week cycle ( 1 x 10 each) would be ~123 euro ( no discount) or ~24.60 per week
Then you could have the bundle bump it to a 10 week (2 x 10 each) with the 20% discount it would be ~ 196.8 euro, or less than 20 euro a week.

Obviously you set the prices and know the business, but I think you may get more action by doing 5/10 week bundles with current dosages. Exploring 5mg or 10mg options could really open things up and drive business. I know I'd pay 200 for ~10 week of recovery, especially with a clean split with 2 x 5 week cycles.
 
That's interesting, from what I've heard, the problem is the solvents/preservatives. I have combined up to 5 peptides from driada in the same syringe with zero issues, but apparently, whatever is added to the peptides can cause other peptides to degrade.
I don’t recommend mixing peptides in the same syringe because the reactions can be unpredictable. I had an instance where I used MOTS-C, and then drew growth hormone into the same syringe. The growth hormone immediately turned cloudy with a pronounced milky hue. I had to throw away the syringe with the hormone.
 
I just assumed that the labs that do it just add 5mg of each to the vial, but I can understand the possibility of breaking down over time once reconstituted.

It'd at least be cool to adjust the "injury support- popular stack" to get the 20% discount. You have to get 6 x 2mg TB500 and either 6 x 2mg BPC157 or 2 x 10mg BPC157. I think most people would end up getting the 2 x10mg BPC because it's cheaper, but then have 8mg left, enough for almost 4 more weeks, but not enough TB500.

cutting it to a ~5 week cycle is a little cleaner with 5 x 2mg TB500 and 1 x 10mg BPC157. This would be ~203 without discount or ~162.4 with discount. If you just discounted the 5 x 2mg TB500 but not the 1 x 10 BPC, it would be ~174.


If you did a cost per week breakdown of the current options-

6 x 2 of each = 264/6 weeks= ~44 per week
6 x 2 and 2 x 10= 232/6 weeks = ~38.67 a week with 8mg leftover BPC
if you bought 4 extra TB500 vials at normal cost to go with the 8mg leftover, you could push it another 4 weeks totaling 348 at a cost of ~34.80 a week for 10 weeks, with the caveat that you started the clock on the second 10mg bottle so you'd need to run the full 10 weeks straight.

with my 5 week cycle proposal
5 x 2mg TB500 and 1 x 10mg BPC157, no discount = 203 / 5 weeks = ~40.30 per week
5 x 2mg TB500 and 1 x 10mg BPC157, TB discount= 174 / 5 weeks = ~34.80 per week
5 x 2mg TB500 and 1 x 10mg BPC157, full discount= 163/ 5 weeks= ~32.60 per week

-- If there was a 10mg TB500 option, assuming the TB500 can stay stable long enough ( which is implied in the option for 2 x 10mg for 6 weeks) at the same discount rate between the 2mg and 10mg BPC157 prices, the cost would be between 64 and 65 euro.

This would mean a 5 week cycle ( 1 x 10 each) would be ~123 euro ( no discount) or ~24.60 per week
Then you could have the bundle bump it to a 10 week (2 x 10 each) with the 20% discount it would be ~ 196.8 euro, or less than 20 euro a week.

Obviously you set the prices and know the business, but I think you may get more action by doing 5/10 week bundles with current dosages. Exploring 5mg or 10mg options could really open things up and drive business. I know I'd pay 200 for ~10 week of recovery, especially with a clean split with 2 x 5 week cycles.
We’ve been looking for TB500 — 10 mg from different suppliers, but unfortunately, they can’t offer better prices, even though there’s a more competitive price for BPC157 — 10 mg.

In fact, when we created these bundles, we didn’t have the 10 mg option. If you'd like, we can create a new bundle with TB500 — 2 mg and BPC157 — 10 mg upon your request — it’s not a problem. Please provide the weekly dosages you think will be relevant and in demand.

When I put together the bundles, I based them on minimal dosages since the bundles themselves are already quite expensive, but personally, I use TB500 — 6 mg per week and 1000 mcg BPC157 every other day, as I believe this dosage is more effective.

Overall, we are planning to update our website soon and would be happy to consider any of your suggestions, including changes to the bundles.
 
i would love to see trestolone but in the enanthate or decanoate ester, injectable anadrol and stenbolone acetate. stenbolone is an amazing steroid that has been forgotten by the bodybuilding community, but was very well regarded in the past. it's basically what would come out if drostanolone and dhb had a baby lol. the c2 methyl group + the c1 c2 double bond most likely makes it almost completely immune to 3 alpha hsd, increasing it's potency even more. i've never got to use it personally, but always have thought of it as almost the perfect molecule. i hope it will make a resurgence
 
i would love to see trestolone but in the enanthate or decanoate ester, injectable anadrol and stenbolone acetate. stenbolone is an amazing steroid that has been forgotten by the bodybuilding community, but was very well regarded in the past. it's basically what would come out if drostanolone and dhb had a baby lol. the c2 methyl group + the c1 c2 double bond most likely makes it almost completely immune to 3 alpha hsd, increasing it's potency even more. i've never got to use it personally, but always have thought of it as almost the perfect molecule. i hope it will make a resurgence
Trest/ Ment E or D & Anadrol Inject sounds amazing 💪🏻✋🏻⛓️
Do you used both in the past? Could you report about both compared to the normal forms?
 
Trest/ Ment E or D & Anadrol Inject sounds amazing 💪🏻✋🏻⛓️
Do you used both in the past? Could you report about both compared to the normal forms?
hi, i have never used trest e or d. only acetate. the reason i like trest is potency, wich means lower injection volume to achieve same level of protein synthesis, wich would be great for someone like me who tends to get a bit of an immune response from very large volumes of test, mast eq etc. the issue with acetate is very short half life, some sources report a little as 12 hours, wich for an aromatasing compound is not too great, unless you are willing to pin at least every day or even twice a day. Typically the enanthate or decanoate esters extend half life to 5 - 10 days. Regarding the injectable 17 alfa methylated steroids, i'm looking at potency, because although the c17 methyl group doesn't shield the c3 keto group, it does make the molecule more resilient to even the second pass liver metabolism (sulfation and glucoronidation for the most part), this allows x amount of active molecules to linger in the body for longer time, allowing them more chances to bind to AR. that is the reason why oral methyldrostanolone (superdrol) is much more potent than injectable drostanolone or methyl tren > tren, dianabol > boldenone etc. and also the reason why the estrogenic metabolite of dbol is so nasty (methylestradiol has lower binding affinity than estradiol, but it builds up because of metabolic resistance, leading to higher AUC and stronger sides). The issue that arises with ingesting c17 methyl steroids is gastric irritation, wich leads to acid reflux and fucked up digestion wich is often attributed to liver toxicity, although i believe this to be mostly wrong, since oxandrolone ( not liver toxic because metabolized by the kidneys due to it being slightly water soluble) still causes acid reflux. By injecting c17 methylated steroids like superdrol, anadrol, dbol etc. you would get the benefits of dramatically increased potency due to higher metabolic stability compared to the esterified counterpart while reducing (but not eliminating) liver toxicity due to skipping first pass liver metabolism and avoiding irritation to gastric mucosa. I have used injectable anadrol in the past, it has similar perceived potency to the oral, but doesn't transform me into a fucking vinegaroon, constantly burping up acid no matter how much PPi or antiacids i would take
 
i would love to see trestolone but in the enanthate or decanoate ester, injectable anadrol and stenbolone acetate. stenbolone is an amazing steroid that has been forgotten by the bodybuilding community, but was very well regarded in the past. it's basically what would come out if drostanolone and dhb had a baby lol. the c2 methyl group + the c1 c2 double bond most likely makes it almost completely immune to 3 alpha hsd, increasing it's potency even more. i've never got to use it personally, but always have thought of it as almost the perfect molecule. i hope it will make a resurgence
Trest/ Ment E or D & Anadrol Inject sounds amazing
hi, i have never used trest e or d. only acetate. the reason i like trest is potency, wich means lower injection volume to achieve same level of protein synthesis, wich would be great for someone like me who tends to get a bit of an immune response from very large volumes of test, mast eq etc. the issue with acetate is very short half life, some sources report a little as 12 hours, wich for an aromatasing compound is not too great, unless you are willing to pin at least every day or even twice a day. Typically the enanthate or decanoate esters extend half life to 5 - 10 days. Regarding the injectable 17 alfa methylated steroids, i'm looking at potency, because although the c17 methyl group doesn't shield the c3 keto group, it does make the molecule more resilient to even the second pass liver metabolism (sulfation and glucoronidation for the most part), this allows x amount of active molecules to linger in the body for longer time, allowing them more chances to bind to AR. that is the reason why oral methyldrostanolone (superdrol) is much more potent than injectable drostanolone or methyl tren > tren, dianabol > boldenone etc. and also the reason why the estrogenic metabolite of dbol is so nasty (methylestradiol has lower binding affinity than estradiol, but it builds up because of metabolic resistance, leading to higher AUC and stronger sides). The issue that arises with ingesting c17 methyl steroids is gastric irritation, wich leads to acid reflux and fucked up digestion wich is often attributed to liver toxicity, although i believe this to be mostly wrong, since oxandrolone ( not liver toxic because metabolized by the kidneys due to it being slightly water soluble) still causes acid reflux. By injecting c17 methylated steroids like superdrol, anadrol, dbol etc. you would get the benefits of dramatically increased potency due to higher metabolic stability compared to the esterified counterpart while reducing (but not eliminating) liver toxicity due to skipping first pass liver metabolism and avoiding irritation to gastric mucosa. I have used injectable anadrol in the past, it has similar perceived potency to the oral, but doesn't transform me into a fucking vinegaroon, constantly burping up acid no matter how much PPi or antiacids i would take
Very very interesting & thanks. Was the strength increasing also so dramatic like oral Anadrol.
How is/ was the strength increasing with liquid Superdrol?
 
Trest/ Ment E or D & Anadrol Inject sounds amazing

Very very interesting & thanks. Was the strength increasing also so dramatic like oral Anadrol.
How is/ was the strength increasing with liquid Superdrol?
there are to many variables to directly attribute any strength gains to a specific modification of your PED regimen unless it's something extreme like going from trt to blasting grams. there shouldn't be any major difference between the two because the active molecule that reaches the bloodstream and then the cytosol is the same. although some of the strenght gains of anadrol are attributed to it's metabolite mestanolone (produced during first pass liver metabolism) i believe that most of the strength gains come simply through hydraulics. more water in your muscle cells just makes you stronger, and the injectable version causes the same amount of water retention. injectable superdrol felt like the oral minus the horrific stomach cramps. that's why i hope driada will carry these versions one day.
 
there are to many variables to directly attribute any strength gains to a specific modification of your PED regimen unless it's something extreme like going from trt to blasting grams. there shouldn't be any major difference between the two because the active molecule that reaches the bloodstream and then the cytosol is the same. although some of the strenght gains of anadrol are attributed to it's metabolite mestanolone (produced during first pass liver metabolism) i believe that most of the strength gains come simply through hydraulics. more water in your muscle cells just makes you stronger, and the injectable version causes the same amount of water retention. injectable superdrol felt like the oral minus the horrific stomach cramps. that's why i hope driada will carry these versions one day.
Me TOO !!!! Damn YES !!! Do you have experience in Testosterone Suspension, Cheque Drops also ?!
Whats even really interesting: Halodrol ( Halotestin midified like Superdrol )
Chlorodehydromethylandrostenediol (CDMA), also known as 4-chloro-17α-methylandrost-1,4-diene-3β,17β-diol, is a synthetic, orally active anabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS)
So Stenbolone is better then DHB ?
 
Back
Top